MARK’S GOSPEL : RESPONDING TO CHALLENGES Readings: Mark 2: 1-17 & 23-28
Sunday 18th January 2026
Introduction
We are continuing our exploration of Mark’s gospel this morning. This gospel was written down about 60 years after the birth of Christ. It is the earliest and most direct account that we have of the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
I wonder if you noticed a common theme in our reading from chapter 2 of Mark’s gospel? Well, the stories in this chapter are all about the same thing. How Jesus dealt with challenges. And how Jesus dealt with challenges is important for us. Why? Because there are people and forces today still opposed to the teachings of Christ; and the advancement of the kingdom of God. Part of the purpose of this series of sermons is to help us build up the church. And to help us build up the kingdom of God. That means we need to know for ourselves how to deal with the kind of challenges that Jesus Christ faced.
Let’s see how challenges to Christ develop in Mark’s gospel.
First, the challenges are in people’s thoughts. Then they become comments and questions to the disciples. Finally, there is direct and deliberate attack. This is more-or-less the same way that challenges and opposition always develop. First, thoughts. Then comments to other people. Finally, (if the feeling is strong enough) direct action.
What were the challenges that Christ had to deal with? In chapter two of Mark, the religious leaders were opposed to Jesus for three main reasons:
Firstly, because of the claims he made; especially (verse 7) to forgive sins.
Secondly, because of the company he kept especially (verse 16) in eating and drinking with tax-collectors and sinners
And thirdly because of the customs he ignored; especially (verse 24) keeping the Sabbath
We’ll look at these, briefly, in turn.
The claim to forgive sins (2: 7)
This is one of the Bible stories I remember from childhood (2: 3-5). These four men taking off the roof from the house and lowering their paralysed friend down through the opening. (I must have been a destructive child!) It must certainly have been a very dramatic event.
How does Jesus respond? Well, he deals with the real roots of this man’s sickness. True health is being in a right relationship with God. And Jesus meets the man’s deepest need when he says: “My son, your sins are forgiven”. Not what he expected; but certainly what he needed.
We need to remember that Jesus came from God, into this world, to confront, and deal with, evil in all its forms. Sickness and disease are consequences of humankind’s sinful condition; and it is this condition that Jesus came to deal with.
And, of course, the teachers of the law; well, they are understandably upset by this. Their response is perfectly proper. Only God can forgive sin. Consequently, Jesus is guilty of blasphemy. There was an alternative explanation; but their eyes were blind to it. Namely, that Jesus could, indeed, speak for God; because he was God incarnate.
Let me read a few words from C.S. Lewis on this claim by Jesus Christ to forgive sins, because they are very helpful (from ‘Mere Christianity’)
“This is really so preposterous as to be comic. We can all understand how someone forgives offences against themselves. You tread on my toe; and I forgive you. You steal my money and I forgive you. But what should we make of someone, themselves unrobbed and untrodden on, who announced that they forgave you for treading on other people’s toes and stealing other people’s money? Asinine fatuity [completely bonkers in modern language!) is the kindest description we should give of their conduct. Yet this is what Jesus did. He told people their sins were forgiven. He never bothered to consult all the other people who their sins had undoubtedly injured. He unhesitatingly behaved as if he was the person chiefly concerned; the person chiefly offended in all offences.
This makes sense only if he really was the God whose laws are broken and whose love is wounded in every sin. In the mouth of any speaker who is not God, these words would imply what I can only regard as a silliness and conceit unrivalled by any other character in history.
That was C. S. Lewis writing in the 1940s. But in the time of Jesus’s ministry on earth, the teachers of the law; the Pharisees; they simply could not accept that Jesus was God. They couldn’t accept it. This is why they were opposed to Jesus. And this is why they challenged him.
They were not bad people; they weren’t evil; but they became opposed to the work that Jesus did. And it is still easy today for good people; religious people to resist, and become opposed to, some new work of God. The challenge to us is to not fall into that trap.
- The company he kept (2:16)
So the claim that Jesus made to forgive sins; that generated opposition. And, then, the second thing in Mark 2 was the company that he kept.
We see (verse 14) how Jesus called Levi to become one of his disciples. (His other name was Matthew; and he is the Matthew of the first gospel). But, when Jesus called him, he was a tax-collector.
Let us be quite clear, in Britain today, taxation is necessary to pay for essential services. So tax-collectors, on the whole, are good people. But at the time of Jesus, these tax-collectors were loathed. They were working on behalf of an invading power; and they were notoriously dishonest.
We may be surprised that Jesus would want someone like Levi in his team. But, according to Mark, Jesus clearly calls him. Directly and personally the call comes (v. 14); and Levi responds immediately. And then, presumably as a spontaneous expression of joy, Levi throws a party for all his old friends (v. 15). We can imagine every rogue – let’s go no stronger than that – every rogue in the area being there, shoulder-to-shoulder with Jesus. Levi wanted to honour his new-found Master – and give others the chance to meet him. We hear a lot about evangelism in the church, don’t we? Well, Levi seems to have actually got on and done something about it.
When the Pharisees get to hear about this – they are scandalised.
Jesus mixing with all this rabble. They think it is disgraceful.
But Jesus responds by saying that it is not those who think they’re OK who need help; but those who know they are not. And he uses the memorable expression: “It is not the healthy that need a doctor, but those who are ill.”
But the Pharisees simply could not accept that they, as much as anyone else needed God’s forgiveness. They couldn’t accept it. This is another reason why they challenged Jesus. They weren’t bad people or evil people; but neither were they themselves without sin. They couldn’t accept this; or realise it; and so their opposition to Jesus grew.
And, again, it is still easy today for good people; religious people to resist, and oppose, God’s work. God may have tremendous plans for us and our church, our community, our nation and our world. The challenge to us is to work with God; and not in opposition to him.
- The customs he ignored (2: 24)
So, we’ve heard how the claim that Jesus made to forgive sins generated opposition. And, then, how the company that he kept added to the opposition.
Finally, we come to what was, probably, his most serious failing in the eyes of the Pharisees; and that is the customs he ignored. In particular, observance of the Sabbath. We saw in chapter 2 (v. 23) how he allowed his disciples to pluck ears of corn on the Sabbath. That incident is complemented by another at the beginning of chapter 3, where Jesus heals a man – on the Sabbath.
Once again, when the Pharisees see these events they think it’s appalling.
For them, observance of the Sabbath was a very important custom. To see it flouted in this way was terrible. And Jesus responds with another of his memorable expressions: “The Sabbath was made for the sake of man; not man for the Sabbath”. The Pharisees wanted the security of rules and regulations and laws to tell them what to do and not to do.
Jesus begins to show them a new revolutionary way; the way of personally responding to God; and how God loves people more than rules.
Rules have their limitations.
Legislation almost always requires definition.
Often the law is quite useless. A tragic example is seen in cases of two babies born as Siamese twins; two babies physically joined together. Judges sometimes have to decide whether they should be surgically separated – against the wishes of their parents – to try and save the life of the stronger twin; while ending the life of the weaker child.
The law is quite useless to those parents and their children in that situation.
And so the message of Jesus is quite clear: people matter more than rules, customs and laws.
Conclusion
We have seen how Jesus dealt with challenges. How can this help us to deal with those who challenge and oppose him today? What Jesus does is to get behind petty criticisms of points of detail to fundamental truths that are at the heart of existence. Truths like these:
True health is not a matter of our physical condition : it is a question of whether our relationship with God is healthy.
It is not the healthy that need a doctor, but the sick.
People are more important than rules and laws.
Jesus brings new light to shine on God’s relationship with us and all people; and new light on our relationship with God. The challenge to us is to live our lives so that they reflect his teaching.